Jimi & me: why Hendrix's ex-lover is taking on Hollywood

A former flame of Jimi Hendrix, who inspired his hit 'Foxy Lady', has launched an attack on an upcoming biopic from the writer behind 12 Years a Slave. She claims she was not consulted in the film's creation, and that some of it is a work of fiction. Kathy Etchingham tells Andrew P Street her side of the story
Jimi Hendrix and Kathy Etchingham in their Mayfair flat in 1969. Below: André Benjamin and Hayley Atwell filming the upcoming Jimi: All Is By My Side
Andrew P. Street7 August 2014

Kathy Etchingham first met Jimi Hendrix on the day he arrived in London in September 1966. She was 20, he was 23, and being managed by her friend Chas Chandler, a former bassist with The Animals, who’d invited her to meet Hendrix at the Scotch of St James nightclub where she was a DJ. Within minutes he was telling her, ‘I think you’re beautiful,’ and so began a three-year love affair.

They lived together in the Hyde Park Towers hotel in Bayswater and Ringo Starr’s flat in Montagu Square, Marylebone, before moving into a tiny flat on Brook Street, Mayfair. They socialised with Eric Clapton and the Rolling Stones, and she says she inspired several of his greatest songs including ‘The Wind Cries Mary’ (her middle name) and ‘Foxy Lady’. They remained on good terms after the breakup and she last saw him the day he died. She wrote fondly about their time together in Through Gypsy Eyes, published by Orion in 1998.

But Etchingham needs to get something off her chest. She is one of the principal characters portrayed in a new Hollywood biopic Jimi: All Is By My Side by the director and 12 Years a Slave screenwriter John Ridley, starring Outkast’s André ‘3000’ Benjamin as Hendrix and Captain America’s Hayley Atwell playing Etchingham. She saw the film at June’s Sydney Film Festival and is not best pleased. She believes both she and Hendrix are misrepresented in the film: him as a dark, twisted genius grappling with his inner demons, and she as a volatile, chain-smoking harpy. She’s particularly displeased about the amount that her character swears. ‘That’s one of the things about being educated in a convent: you learn to speak without swearing,’ she laughs. ‘And in the film I’m effing and blinding all the time.’ She believes the story the film tells is not in line with her account and ‘implies that I lied in my book. So I’m defending myself as much as I am Jimi’. Brook Street Films, the London-based production company behind it, has already responded to Etchingham’s complaint that she was not consulted by anyone involved in the production, stating via LA-based lawyers: ‘The Producers thoroughly researched all aspects of the Picture prior to commencing production, including elements concerning living people. Based on this extensive research, the Producers stand firmly by their portrayal of Ms Etchingham in the Picture.’

On first appearances Etchingham doesn’t come across as a bitter person. She’s friendly and welcoming, chatting about how the nearby train station redevelopment in her Melbourne suburb will revitalise the area. She lives in a spacious home with her doctor husband of four decades. There’s still a hint of the gamine waif who caught Hendrix’s eye, but otherwise she looks much like any other middle-class woman in her sixties.

When asked by ES why Etchingham was not approached by the makers of the film, Brook Street Films declined to give further comment. Etchingham’s face darkens when she talks about what she sees as Ridley’s attempts to rewrite the past. ‘Personal things [in the film] are just made up,’ she insists. ‘Yet you look at these reviewers, and of course they all think it’s true — this “complicated relationship”.’ In one scene a furious Hendrix beats Kathy’s face to a pulp with a telephone. It’s a pivotal moment in the film but, according to Etchingham, it never happened: ‘I seem to have a broken nose, smashed-in face, blood everywhere, and somehow apparently nobody noticed [at the time],’ she laughs. ‘I don’t know how Chas Chandler [who died in 1996] wouldn’t have noticed, since we all lived in the same place. And he would have had a fit.

‘And with injuries such as that, you’d have to go to the hospital. First thing the doctors would have done is call the bloody police. Jimi would have been arrested, and he would have been deported — he only had a work permit, he wasn’t a permanent resident. So the whole thing is ridiculous.’ Brook Street Films also declined to comment on whether any events in the film were fictional when approached.

The other scene that drew particular ire comes straight afterwards. ‘There’s this fictitious character Ida, and I say to her, “They’ve given me painkillers and sleeping tablets,” and she says, “Oh, don’t get them mixed up.” The next scene is me sitting up in a hospital bed, with Jimi sitting on the side of the bed and then he just sort of fades away. I think the suggestion is that I took an overdose,’ she smirks.

According to Kathy, any notion that Hendrix had a violent temper comes from one ‘discredited’ biography, Jimi: An Intimate Biography of Jimi Hendrix, by a former band mate Curtis Knight, now deceased: ‘In the early 1970s Curtis wrote a book in which he claimed he interviewed me and that I told him about Jimi beating me and all kinds of ridiculous things,’ she sighs. ‘He wanted to write a really sensational book so he threw a lot of crap around.’

So what was Hendrix actually like? ‘He was a really nice guy,’ she says. ‘He was really funny. He could mimic anyone. We had a lot of fun.’

Etchingham explains that she wasn’t even aware of the book until 1974, when she returned to the UK after living abroad. ‘My friend said “He says you’ve been interviewed; when did you do that?” and I said, “I didn’t.”’ She tells me the out-of-print book was pulped after she took legal action, and she thought that would be it. ‘And then along comes the internet and it’s like a worldwide publication again. How many times do I have to say, “I didn’t give him an interview, I didn’t say it.”? So now I’ve gone down in history as being volatile and tempestuous!’

Extracts from Knight’s book have been reprinted across the internet, giving some credibility to what Etchingham insists was a fabrication. ‘John Ridley gave an interview and said, “Oh, I had to be a historical referee.” That he had read four or five versions of the same event. Now, wouldn’t you think that he would actually check his facts with the person who’s still alive?’ The interview appeared in The Seattle Times earlier this year. Speaking to that newspaper about his ‘refereeing’, Ridley said: ‘[He went with] which one of the stories feels the most correct, which one feels the most objective and fair to all the people probably involved.’

She sits forward. ‘And if John Ridley really thought that this had happened to me — that I’d been badly beaten up and I’d overdosed —wouldn’t he contact me and tell me, “I’m going to show something on the silver screen all over the world about something that may have caused you post-traumatic stress disorder, as an abused partner?” But he didn’t.’

In March 2013 Ridley’s lawyers threatened to sue her ‘for infringement of our client’s First Amendment rights of free speech and expression’. Meanwhile Etchingham says her team is exploring possible legal action over what she calls ‘the overdose scene’. She insists that it is fabricated and defamatory of her.

She adds: ‘Under the National Health Service you have the same medical records from birth to death, and there’s nothing in there because I’ve never been in hospital and I’ve never been prescribed painkillers and sleeping tablets. I don’t take either, and I never have. My worst vice is that I smoke occasionally and have the occasional glass of wine.

‘That’s not great for a film — I don’t think it would go down quite as well [narratively speaking], our having a glass of Sauvignon Blanc with dinner,’ she laughs. ‘But Ridley knew what he wanted, and he didn’t need me to confirm or deny it.’

Etchingham tells me about a memory she would have liked to have seen in the film. There was a furious argument after Hendrix had criticised her mashed potatoes. She stormed out to stay with a friend and when she returned, a contrite Hendrix had written ‘The Wind Cries Mary’. ‘It’s a sweet, funny story — and it’s not in the film. The film’s all dark and everyone’s under pressure.’ Etchingham claims that the film portrays Hendrix as ‘a washed-up nobody before he went to Monterey’, the 1967 music festival in California largely considered a career-defining moment for him. ‘Except that before he went to Monterey, ‘Hey Joe’ had got to number six in the UK — it’s ridiculous!’ ‘The Wind Cries Mary’ and ‘Purple Haze’ had also been top ten hits in the UK.

The Hendrix estate has prevented Ridley using any of Jimi’s music for the film. ‘Without the music, what story can he tell? He could tell the story that was in my book,’ says Etchingham. Earlier this year Janie Hendrix — Jimi’s sister and president and CEO of Hendrix Experience — announced a long-term agreement with ICM Partners whereby the international company will represent the Hendrix family-owned and managed company to produce a first, authorised, feature film. The anticipated biopic will have access to the full catalogue of original Hendrix music including ‘Voodoo Chile’, ‘Crosstown Traffic’ and scores of other signature songs. In April Janie Hendrix told The Wall Street Journal: ‘I can tell you nothing about the new biopic that’s coming out because I haven’t seen it, and I’ve not been paying much attention to it. But we just did a deal with ICM in which we’re putting out our own biopic, and this is the first time ever we have an authorised movie for Jimi. We’re really excited about it, we have some ideas of how we want to pick the person we want to play Jimi and of course it will have all the music in it, and of course this is the first bio that will.’

Janie Hendrix says she too was not consulted in the making of Ridley's film. When asked by The Wall Street Journal if she was concerned about the accuracy of it, she said: ‘I’m not really concerned too much at all since we weren’t involved. I’m really concerned about the movie we are working on and I think I’ll put my energies into that.’

The conversation with Etchingham closes with a shrug. ‘This guy hasn’t got the music, so instead of abandoning the project he uses me, basically, because he desperately wanted to make a film about Jimi Hendrix. Jimi had more talent in his little finger than John Ridley’s got in his whole body.’

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in